Sportsmen were the first conservationists

The healthy and abundant populations of wildlife that thrive in North America today didn’t just happen. 

If Mother Nature had her way, much of it would have gone the way of the dinosaur early in this century.

But in the middle of the 19th century, when vast buffalo herds still roamed the western prairies and flocks of passenger pigeons blackened the skies, a group of farsighted eastern sportsmen took some historic steps for which we should all be grateful. Their actions helped lay the groundwork for today’s state and federally administered game management programs.

The first major conservation move by sport hunters was probably in 1844 when a group of prominent New Yorkers formed the New York Sportsmen’s Club, which was later renamed the New York Association for the Protection of Game. The organization’s primary goal was to stop the sale of game killed out of season.

The strategy was to file suit against New York City restaurants and markets that sold illegal game. The organization’s success in that arena, as well as its efforts to strengthen weak game laws, proved sufficiently effective to encourage other organizations in New England. By 1900, according to Lonnie Williamson of the Wildlife Management Institute, 374 protective game societies modeled after the New York Sportsmen were active in most New England states.

These groups, and the ones that followed, were born from overwhelming concern among sportsmen about the unthinking and uncontrolled killing of wildlife during the 19th and early 20th centuries.

It was around the turn of the century that many states began to set up official game commissions – usually a direct outgrowth of organized sportsmen’s organizations. In fact, when the state wildlife agencies were formed, officers of the sportsmen’s clubs often became the agencies commissioners.

In 1852 Maine became the first state to employ (at $25 to $75 annually) salaried game wardens. Though most state agencies limited game laws to establishing closed spring seasons, Maine, imposed a bag limit of three deer per season as early as 1873.

In those developmental years, hunting licenses were not required in many states and the fledgling state agencies were financed entirely by general state funds. However, in 1895 North Dakota made it mandatory for all hunters to purchase a license from the state, with funds appropriated to the game commission.

From those modest beginnings developed a network that raises and spends billions annually in support of fish and wildlife. The Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program, known more as the Pittman-Robertson Act, is perhaps the most renown wildlife conservation effort of all time – and was the idea and result of sport hunters.

According to Williamson, the original suggestion for what was to become the PR program came in 1925 from a committee appointed by International Association of  Game, Fish and Conservation Commissioners (now the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies). The committee included John Burham of the Wildlife Management Institiute, T. Gilbert Pearson of the National Audubon Society, George Selover of the Izaak Walton League and David Madsen and William Adams, representing the Utah and Massachusetts fish and wildlife departments.

It was nearly a dozen years later, however, before Carl Shoemaker pushed the Pittman-Robertson idea through Congress and into the statute books. Shoemaker, also a sportsman with a penchant for double-barreled shotguns, was head of the Oregon Fish and Game Commission before coming to Washington, D.C., as a staffer on the newly formed Senate Wildlife Committee. Shoemaker wrote the PR bill, gained industry support, and got the measure introduced and approved by Congress in less than five months.

The program collects special excise taxes from manufacturers on all hunting and shooting equipment and redistributes the money to state wildlife agencies at a rate based on the number of hunting licenses sold by each state. In 1950 a similar program involving fishing tackle was instituted to benefit fisheries management. It was called the Dingell-Johnson Act and was expanded in the 1980s by the Wallop-Breaux Amendment.

Since its inception in 1937, the PR program has apportioned more than 3 billion dollars to state wildlife agencies for habitat restoration work.

Each year more than 126 million hunters pay in excess of $345 million in license fees and 30 million fisherman chip in another $315 million. Through special excise taxes on their equipment, hunters contribute $90 million annually and fisherman $140 million to funds used exclusively for fish and wildlife restoration programs.

In addition to the government-funded programs, sportsmen also founded independent conservation groups to fund wildlife management.

The Boone & Crockett Club was among the first national groups to form, according to Williamson. That was in 1887 and was in response to market hunting and subsistence hunting by entrepreneurs and settlers that decimated big game in the Dakotas. Returning east from a two-year ranching stint in North Dakota, Theodore Roosevelt eased the pain of carnage that he witnessed by forming the B&C Club from sportsmen who doubled as the nation’s leading explorers, writers, military leaders, scientists and politicians. 

Among the club’s first accomplishments was getting a full troop of the Sixth U.S. Cavalry assigned to help Superintendent George Anderson control poaching and vandalism in Yellowstone National Park.

The League of American Sportsmen was organized in 1898 by George Oliver Shields, editor of Recreation Magazine. This organization, along with the Audubon Societies, the B & C Club and state game protective associations, helped enact the Lacy Act of 1900, which was the first major law affecting fish and wildlife. In essence, the act prohibits interstate shipment of illegally taken wildlife. That law eventually helped eliminate much of the market hunting for plume birds and big game.

The American sportmen’s drive to fund conservation has not been without its snags, however, according to Williamson. Take, for example, the 1911 offer by Winchester Repeating Arms to give the New York Zoological Society $25,000 annually if the society would launch a program to protect game populations. Society head William Hornaday, a vocal opponent of sport hunting and sporting arms, refused.

Winchester then approached the National Audubon Society (which was formed by noted sportsman George Bird Grinnell in 1886) with the same offer made to Hornaday. The Audubon Society originally accepted, agreeing to expand its program to check the relentless slaughter of game birds and animals. The $25,000 would have about doubled Audubon’s annual income. But charges surfaced in the news media that Audubon had “sold out to the gun people who wanted to kill all the birds in the country.” Consequently the Audubon board reversed itself and refused the industry’s grant.